In her newest rant Lady Ann makes a simple argument (see below). However, if anarchy does ensue then should not the conservatives be delighted at an opportunity to restart the process and rewrite the rules?

A very long, yet thought provoking, quote of the week.


By Lady Ann

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The conservative argument for enforcing manifestly absurd court rulings is that the only other option is anarchy.

But we are already living in anarchy. It's a one-sided, "Alice in Wonderland" anarchy in which liberals always win and conservatives always lose – and then cheerfully enforce their own defeats. Oh, you see an abortion clause in there? OK, I don't see it, but we'll enforce it. Sodomy, too, you say? OK, it's legal. Gay marriage? Just give us a minute to change the law. No prayer in schools? It's out. Go-go dancing is speech, but protest at abortion clinics isn't? Okey-dokey. No Ten Commandments in the courthouse? Somebody get the number of a monument removal service.

What passes for "constitutional law" can be fairly summarized as: Heads we win, tails you lose. The only limit on liberal insanity in this country is how many issues liberals can get before a court.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------