Wednesday, October 29, 2003

My chance to be Lady Ann for a day.

Defending President Bush’s latest speech in which he declared that America is safer because of his policies Tony Blankley of THE WASHINGTON TIMES states a common yet terribly stupid liberal argument:

“ Obviously, if we hadn't invaded Iraq (and Afghanistan), things would be more peaceful right now. American soldiers wouldn't be dying on foreign soil, and there would be no explosions on the streets of Baghdad. If we had let the U.N. quietly, politely and ineffectively continue to complain to Saddam Hussein and the Taliban for their various misdeeds, the French, Germans and many Muslim governments would not now be saying rude things about America. We might even be admired around the world for our forbearance, restraint and maturity after that tragedy in New York and at the Pentagon.�

Mr. Blankley is paraphrasing the liberal alternative to our crises. He goes on to praise our president. But, the liberal argument still stands. Senator Ted Kennedy and most of the presidential candidates still believe in this garbage of a choice. The liberals still don’t get it.

These liberal fantasies of world peace and UN effectiveness are getting tiresome. The constant regurgitation of these contentions is proof that certain liberals cannot distinguish between a good argument and a bad one. For them an argument is like a religion that needs no proof, and cannot be countered because it is the ultimate truth.
Furthermore, they refuse to concede when they are wrong by allowing themselves to be hypocritical. (Insert contrast here-liberal reaction to Clinton lying and actually getting head in the white house while speaking to Senator and Arnold maybe groping some ass).

To prove this less then subtle point I would like to illustrate the example of North Korea; that other “evil� state. The UN inspectors inspected for years and found nothing. The inspectors were kicked out and then North Korea declared that they have nukes, missile contracts with Pakistan, and plans to build more nukes. The inspectors had failed to find traces of these activities and ultimately failed their purpose. But, the liberals still worship them.

And since when, outside of gay sex, is it ok for one to take it up the ass? We were devastated on 9/11 and many liberals wish that we had done nothing and shown restraint. And how telling it is of someone who likes inaction. In his discussion he excludes the resistant and heroic victims of the 4th plane that crashed in a field. Yep, liberals rarely mention this little fact. After all it counters their notions of what work.

And since when does America need the French, who would not exist if it wasn’t for the US, or the Germans, who would have been starving ex-Soviets had the US not stepped up to it’s defense? They owe their allegiance to us.

So, did I do it? Can I pull her off? Will I pass as lady Ann this Halloween?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

-->
Name:
Location: LA, California, United States
...three years ago, the leader of al-Qaida in Mesopotamia wrote to his guru Osama Bin Laden, saying that there was a real danger of the electoral process succeeding in Iraq and of "suffocating" the true Islamist cause. The only way of preventing this triumph of the democratic heresy, wrote Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, was to make life so unbearable for the heretical Shiites that they would respond in kind. The ensuing conflict would ruin all the plans of the Crusader-Zionist alliance." By Mr. Hitch"